Our story

Built to solve a problem that most investors share

The more time and energy you pour into trading, the worse your outcomes tend to be. No-Stress-Trading was built around that single uncomfortable truth.

The problem was obvious.
The solution took a decade to verify.

The research on active trading is unambiguous. Transaction costs accumulate. Emotional decisions destroy compounding. Even professional fund managers — with full-time research teams and institutional resources — underperform a simple index ETF 76% of the time. The evidence was not hard to find. What was hard was building something better that did not simply replicate the complexity it was meant to eliminate.

The goal was never a sophisticated system. It was the simplest possible rules-based approach that could consistently outperform the Nasdaq-100, executed by anyone with a brokerage account and 5 minutes on the first of each month.

"We did not want to build a tool that required expertise to use. We wanted to build one that made expertise unnecessary."

The result is a momentum strategy applied systematically to the Nasdaq-100. It scores every stock in the index by recent performance, selects the top 3–6, and delivers exact trade instructions. No discretion. No interpretation. No monitoring required between signals.

From idea to verified track record

2015 — Origin
The backtest begins

The momentum algorithm is applied retrospectively to 10 years of Nasdaq-100 data. The results are striking — but backtests prove nothing until tested live. The decision is made to run the strategy in a verified public environment before offering it to anyone.

+59.6%first year backtest return vs +8.4% Nasdaq-100
2020 — The stress test
COVID crash — and recovery

March 2020 was the most severe test any momentum strategy could face: a sudden, unforeseeable 34% market crash followed by an equally sudden V-shaped recovery. The monthly strategy captured the recovery with precision — its best single year by a wide margin.

+170.2%Monthly Strategy in 2020 vs +47.6% Nasdaq-100
2021 — The honest failure
The year we underperformed — and what it taught us

2021 was a broad, stimulus-fuelled melt-up. Every stock rose together. In this environment, selecting only the top 3–6 momentum stocks offered no advantage over holding the entire index. Both strategies underperformed. This was not a surprise — it is a known structural limitation. Writing about it openly, before subscribers asked, became a founding principle of how we communicate.

-3.9%Monthly Strategy vs +26.6% Nasdaq-100
2022 — Bear market resilience
The strategy protects capital

The Federal Reserve's aggressive rate-hiking cycle drove the Nasdaq-100 down 33% in 2022 — its worst year in two decades. Momentum positioning rotated toward more resilient assets before the sustained decline. The monthly strategy fell just 5.3%.

-5.3%Monthly Strategy vs -33.0% Nasdaq-100
2023 onwards — Live on Wikifolio
Public verification begins

Both strategies go live on Wikifolio.de — a BaFin-regulated platform where every trade is logged, timestamped, and publicly auditable. No screenshots, no PDFs, no selective disclosure. Anyone can verify the results independently, right now, without taking our word for anything.

2+ yearslive, publicly audited track record

Three principles that drive everything

1

Simplicity over complexity

Every rule exists for a reason. If it can be removed without losing performance, it is removed. Complexity is the enemy of consistent execution — and consistent execution is what produces long-term results.

2

Transparency over claims

Every return figure on this website is backed by publicly verifiable data. The live track record is not a PDF — it is a public Wikifolio portfolio anyone can verify today, including every down month, without trusting us at all.

3

Discipline over excitement

The strategy's edge does not come from picking perfect stocks. It comes from doing the same thing, at the same time, every month — regardless of news, regardless of how the market feels. The 10-minute rule enforces this discipline.

You never have to take our word for it

Wikifolio.de
Live traded certificates. 2+ year history. Every trade logged and timestamped — visible to anyone.
BaFin-regulated platform. Independently auditable by anyone. Cannot be faked or edited retroactively.
eToro
Public investor profile. Real-money trading. Full trade history visible to the global community.
30M+ user platform. Results visible publicly. No selective disclosure possible.
10-year backtest dataset
Monthly returns 2015–2024, both strategies, vs Nasdaq-100. Full dataset on the Performance page.
Every year shown — including the three negative years. Nothing is hidden or smoothed.

View Full Track Record →

We publish underperformance posts
before subscribers ask

The honesty principle

Why we always write about our bad years first

Whenever the strategy underperforms a market period — as it did in 2021 — we write about it proactively. We explain the mechanism, show that it was anticipated, and put it in the context of the long-term picture. We do this before subscribers ask, not after.

This is not a communications strategy. It is the only honest thing to do. Subscribers who understand why the strategy underperforms in certain conditions stay disciplined through difficult periods. That discipline is where long-term compounding is won or lost. A subscriber who panics and exits in a bad month loses more than a bad year — they lose all the compounding they would have captured by staying.

61/61
Rolling 5-year windows positive
37/37
7-year windows beating a savings account
3
Negative years in 10 — all disclosed openly

See the data for yourself

Every number on this page is publicly verifiable. Start with the full 10-year performance breakdown.